I am trying to discern the purpose and point of this thread and topic, in sober fashion, but not in a way that is truculent or aveering to the mark, or anyone that has/drives these as pictured herein in the OP.
I am trying to understand even the point. Thus, I suppose one could build a space shuttle and then put a badge name on it that says 'Jeep'. Or, put another way, these rigs can be anything anyone wants them to be.
The bottom line is what the mark was designed to be/use/deploy, in a way akin to a mechanical horse or mule so to speak, not a Rolls Royce type comfort affair, and therein is the crux. For instance, this is the Jeep I saw as a child in my dad's scrapbook and what it did/does for what it is:
Then, I kept going with 'new' Jeeps till I arrived at this:
From there, I never could figure how the mark would be 'better' for what I end up doing with it or its real intended use: DD, Around the world, On road, Off Road, No road, to the far sides of the world. So, as the mark evolved, it has gotten to the point it is very very limited in what it can do, where it can go and its dependability in all seasons, all reasons, all places. It seems to be so advanced in technology, so big in size, that it is very limited in just about
everything that has to do with the original mark/concept.
Or put another way, beyond the name, it is no longer a Jeep at all, by original concept. But it is still called such, no matter the physical repose it has become.
I'm not sure if that is clear, but it is reasonable when one like me who is so retro, reads a thread like this as started by the OP.
Baffling in fact.
Is it
really a 'Jeep'?
Robert