Snitty
New member
the air source for a pusher is more readily availible... i understand what you mean on the resistance deal.... but the resistance between the radiator and the fan will be different in each application... the blades of a fan, when spinning, create a vacuum on the output side of the fan, and the air in the back is pulled toward the fan because of this vacuum... with a pusher, that air that must be returned is there to be pulled in.. in a puller, there is more of a vacuum created behind the fan ("behind" meaning on the input side, "behind" the airflow) because of the higher resistance of due to the radiator, causing less air through the fan.... though, with a puller, ALL of the air being pulled through the fan IS pulled through the radiator... with a pusher, the increased pressure from the radiator will cause some air to be forced back out the sides of the fan in an outward force.... but.... the fan runs easier, and pushes a higher volume of air TO the radiator....
as i look at it now... it is a toss up.... what is better? 80% of a higher volume of air going TO the radiator.. or 100% of a lesser volume going THROUGH the radiator... i guess you can decide based on ease of installation and preference... I think if you go with a 16" fan, either way will be completely fine
as i look at it now... it is a toss up.... what is better? 80% of a higher volume of air going TO the radiator.. or 100% of a lesser volume going THROUGH the radiator... i guess you can decide based on ease of installation and preference... I think if you go with a 16" fan, either way will be completely fine