North Korea Nukes



Fox News said:
The weapons are thought to be manufactured before 1991 so they would not be proof of an ongoing WMD program in the 1990s. But they do show that Saddam Hussein was lying when he said all weapons had been destroyed, and it shows that years of on-again, off-again weapons inspections did not uncover these munitions.

Hoekstra said the report, completed in April but only declassified now, shows that "there is still a lot about Iraq that we don't fully understand."

Asked why the Bush administration, if it had known about the information since April or earlier, didn't advertise it, Hoekstra conjectured that the president has been forward-looking and concentrating on the development of a secure government in Iraq.

Offering the official administration response to FOX News, a senior Defense Department official pointed out that the chemical weapons were not in useable conditions.

"This does not reflect a capacity that was built up after 1991," the official said, adding the munitions "are not the WMDs this country and the rest of the world believed Iraq had, and not the WMDs for which this country went to war."

Sparky-Watts said:
Depending on your source, that is still up to debate as to whether any were actually found, but the general consensus is that none existed on a large scale. There were a few shells here and there left over from when he gassed the Kurds, but nothing new had been produced since that time, contrary to what Bush led the American people and the UN to believe.

Thanks for helping to prove my point.8) You really should read the articles before you post them.

So, if we've found so much evidence to prove that Bush wasn't lying about why we went to war, why hasn't he or his spin doctors brought this up? I mean, if there's so much evidence to support his actions, why is he still taking it on the chin for lying to the American populace? I'm thinking because there isn't any evidence to support his actions.
 

Another Article Supporting Sparky posted by TwistedCopper said:
The Bush administration commissioned the Iraq Survey Group to determine whether in fact any WMD existed in Iraq. After a year and half of meticulously combing through the country, here’s what the administration’s own inspectors reported:

While a small number of old, abandoned chemical munitions have been discovered, ISG judges that Iraq unilaterally destroyed its undeclared chemical weapons stockpile in 1991. There are no credible Indications that Baghdad resumed production of chemical munitions thereafter, a policy ISG attributes to Baghdad’s desire to see sanctions lifted, or rendered ineffectual, or its fear of force against it should WMD be discovered.

The White House should immediately announce whether it stands with Santorum or whether it stands behind the review conducted by Charles Duelfer and the Iraq Survey Group. Recall, in October 2004, Bush said of Duelfer’s analysis:

The chief weapons inspector, Charles Duelfer, has now issued a comprehensive report that confirms the earlier conclusion of David Kay that Iraq did not have the weapons that our intelligence believed were there.

Shall I rest my case yet, or not?
 
I thought I was posting a link to Santorum. That website is a joke. I was pretty tired last night. That must have been a real hoot for ya. Heck it even made me laugh this morning!

Hey, I tell you what... you go ahead and believe that "think progress" site. That way you "win" here. Okay?
 
Last edited:

Yeah. I agree. Sorry I even brought it up.
The Sparky vs. T.C. debates are getting old. I gotta admit it was good entertainment at first. Now it's become just another thread hi-jack.
Let's all hold hands and sing koombayah (or however you spell it).
 
:agree: Wow, I am SO glad I read through all of this! My fault, really, here I was expecting this to be a discussion on nuclear weapons, don't know WHAT I was thinking... Whatever, I've got wood to cut.
 
:agree: Wow, I am SO glad I read through all of this! My fault, really, here I was expecting this to be a discussion on nuclear weapons, don't know WHAT I was thinking... Whatever, I've got wood to cut.

nice out!:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Keep that saw pointed away from vital body parts!:lol:
 

Agreed. Same reason I seldom if ever post in a political thread. What's the use?

Maybe you and some of the other mods should post more....kinda nip things in the bud before they get started. No, I'm not blaming the moderators, I'll take half the blame upon myself, but, I believe it is your job to keep things under control, right?:???:
 
Back
Top