TwistedCU
New member
I'd be happy to list the several things (including the WMD's) found in Iraq that violated the agreement that Saddam signed, but in another thread. You're welcome to start one. Not trying to be difficult but I could see that would be a discussion in itself.
About North Korea, and also President George H.W. Bush's initial withdrawl from Iraq...
Although I am sure it was clear to both of "Da Bushes" that the UN was clearly a stubling block in both instances, you must acknowledge the fact that they are the voice of several important allies of the United States. The United States is also an important part of the UN in addition to being the largest financier (unfortunately). We have agreed to participate and adhere to , with certain exceptions, their policies. edit - don't get me wrong, I can't stand the UN, but they have to be respected somewhat.
That said, in reference to Iraq, there was tremendous pressure to not follow Saddam's army into Iraq after the gulf war. We agreed but under the conditions referenced earlier. It wasn't a bad move, because Bush knew they would probably screw up and we'd go in anyway. What he didn't know is the UN wouldn't stand behind it and neither would the US under the Clinton admisnistration. Saddam continually thumbed his nose, tested waters, and when our current Predsident got in to office it was made clear early on (pre-9/11/01) that if Saddam continued to disobey the agreements there would be repercussions. He followed through. The UN would still be playing the game. (It appears we at least agree on our opinion of the UN ).
In reference to N. Korea: Again, yes pressure from the UN, but this time it is different. There has been no war (yet?). There has been no misuse of these weapons against another country. It is insane to bomb a country for merely testing weapons. Insane in the sense that it would have the entire world up in arms against us. We truly would be alone on that one and it would accomplish nothing except start a war with that manic over there. They have nukes now, the playing field is different. Sure the UN is inept. Sure diplomacy with N. Korea is pointless, but to just open up and attack them then or even now would be a pre-emptive strike and an act of war, which that maniac would love to have happen.
What we need to do is stay ahead of them as I mentioned earlier. North Korea won't be the last country to delvelop these weapons, and we can't go into every country that develops them with guns and missles blazing.
Every great nation in history that spread themselves too thin trying to dominate or police like that perished soon after. We would be no different.
About North Korea, and also President George H.W. Bush's initial withdrawl from Iraq...
Although I am sure it was clear to both of "Da Bushes" that the UN was clearly a stubling block in both instances, you must acknowledge the fact that they are the voice of several important allies of the United States. The United States is also an important part of the UN in addition to being the largest financier (unfortunately). We have agreed to participate and adhere to , with certain exceptions, their policies. edit - don't get me wrong, I can't stand the UN, but they have to be respected somewhat.
That said, in reference to Iraq, there was tremendous pressure to not follow Saddam's army into Iraq after the gulf war. We agreed but under the conditions referenced earlier. It wasn't a bad move, because Bush knew they would probably screw up and we'd go in anyway. What he didn't know is the UN wouldn't stand behind it and neither would the US under the Clinton admisnistration. Saddam continually thumbed his nose, tested waters, and when our current Predsident got in to office it was made clear early on (pre-9/11/01) that if Saddam continued to disobey the agreements there would be repercussions. He followed through. The UN would still be playing the game. (It appears we at least agree on our opinion of the UN ).
In reference to N. Korea: Again, yes pressure from the UN, but this time it is different. There has been no war (yet?). There has been no misuse of these weapons against another country. It is insane to bomb a country for merely testing weapons. Insane in the sense that it would have the entire world up in arms against us. We truly would be alone on that one and it would accomplish nothing except start a war with that manic over there. They have nukes now, the playing field is different. Sure the UN is inept. Sure diplomacy with N. Korea is pointless, but to just open up and attack them then or even now would be a pre-emptive strike and an act of war, which that maniac would love to have happen.
What we need to do is stay ahead of them as I mentioned earlier. North Korea won't be the last country to delvelop these weapons, and we can't go into every country that develops them with guns and missles blazing.
Every great nation in history that spread themselves too thin trying to dominate or police like that perished soon after. We would be no different.
Last edited: