Let me Explain without keeping ANYTHING private.
How it starts.
Moderator:
Boston and east coast posts have been split to a new thread, too much of a hijack on the age thread to follow. Check it out and post over there if it's not about your age.
My response:
Dood, Splitting the thread?? That isn't right. let the thread sit as it is. Sorry you couldn't "follow" it but no one else complained. Too many times have threads been "hi-jacked" to no avail, no splitting, no deleting.
Put it back the way you found it. I was actually having fun watching the post count.
Here is Where it went to PMs and should have been kept to the main view. This concerns everyone.
Moderator:
If you want to question something I do as a moderator, shoot me a PM and we'll make things straight. Just posting and telling me to "Put it back the way you found it" does nothing.
I don't appreciate the post.
My Response:
Appreciation has nothing to do with it. Questioning the reason behind your moderating that ONE thread is. I stand behind what I posted. I think you edited it for the wrong reasons and If I have to I will go to the board Owners I will.
Moderator:
You don't think that thread was hijacked (hijacked not being a bad thing, just better for everyone if it has it's own thread)?
Why do you think the software gives the ability to split threads?
If you think this is serious enough, you go to whomever you feel it's necessary to.
I still don't think it's right that you call me out on the forum, shoot me a PM and let's get it squared away like adults.
My response:
We all have our Opinions. I think it is silly to PM about something like this because it has to do with more than you and I. I don't know why nor do I care the Data-base has the Option to separate, it shouldn't be done. Again, MANY threads over the 7 months I have been here have been hi-jacked and no one said a word. Lock the Thing sure. "The post was getting to long, so, it is now closed," IF that had been stated in a TOS (Terms Of Service) or a ROC (Rules of Conduct). But to split it just because you are finding it "hard to follow" is abuse of power and should not be allowed to continue.
Moderator:
I did what I felt was best for jeepz.com, not what was best for me. I can't speak for what has or has not been done in the past. This thread was long, and had two obvious long subjects intertwined. I saw it in the best interest of the users as a whole and in the in the interest of effeciency to act as I did. It will not be undone by me. Again, you do what you feel you must.
Why are you the only one who feels strongly on this?
My Response:
apparently I am not the only one that feels this way. I have had other messages stating from other jeepz users saying they didn't like the split. It wasn't just me. Mainly I was pissed off that you picked up an attitude with me for mearly stating my Opinion. I didn't think it was right to split it. I will not be sending another PM because I don't think it is right to hide this issue.
Then again jeepz isn't a democracy is it. You moderators have all the say and it is a "I don't have to ask" attitude. I thought jeepz.com was above that but alas I am again proven wrong.
Moderator:
I didn't purposely pick up an attitude, so I apologize if you perceived one.
No, it's not a democracy and there is no such thing as free speech on a privately owned and operated forum.
I get the impression you have a problem with moderators in general and any action they take ("You moderators").
My response:
I am not going to even comment on this any longer. IMO it was a bad call on your part. I stand behind that. Never have I read on Jeepz that we are not allowed to have "long" threads, but you took it on your own whim to make it fit "your" wants. No one else was part of that decission. But after this time I am sure I will not be back. Moderate whatever you like.
Many times have I sat aside idle and watched many folk have issues with the Moderator in question. Nothing has been done.
What do you do when you are not happy with the service that you get at a given location? You leave.
So must I.